Most specifically he discusses the responsibility of affluence countries such as the United Kingdom and Australia to send aid to refugees from East Bengal, at the cost of not developing less morally important goods such as the Concorde Program or the Sydney Opera House. In more general terms he is getting at the fact that we must prevent as much bad from happening as possible, up until the point at which we start to fall victim to a moral harm comparable to the worst moral harm that exists. To illustrate with an example, suppose you saw a child playing in the street and a car approaching rapidly.
It argues that affluent persons are morally obligated to donate far more resources to humanitarian causes than is considered normal in Western cultures. The essay was inspired by the starvation of Bangladesh Liberation War refugeesand uses their situation as an example, although Singer's argument is general in scope and not limited to the example of Bangladesh.
The essay is anthologized widely as an example of Western ethical thinking.
|Your Answer||In this article Singer presents his view that people, who live relatively well-off life, have the same moral obligations before the poor, no matter if they are their neighbors or citizens of some distant country.|
|Critical Analysis of Peter Singer’s Famine Affluence and Morality Essay Example for Free||As defined by Singer, "morally decent" does not mean "fulfilling all moral obligations.|
|Downloading prezi...||Write My Essay Posted in Essays have to make an outline in a separate page just explaining these steps briefly and in the paper i have to go in more details about those steps.|
According to Singer, such inaction is clearly immoral if a child is drowning in a shallow pond and someone can save it but chooses not to; nor does placing greater geographical distance between the person in need and the potential helper reduce the latter's moral obligations: It makes no difference whether the person I can help is a neighbor's child ten yards away from me or a Bengali whose name I shall never know, ten thousand miles away.
From the moral point of view, the prevention of the starvation of millions of people outside our society must be considered at least as pressing as the upholding of property norms within our society.
Here is the thrust of Singer's argument: Indeed, the alternative does not occur to them.
This way of looking at the matter cannot be justified. When we buy new clothes not to keep ourselves warm but to look 'well-dressed' we are not providing for any important need.Evaluate Peter Singer’s argument in ‘Famine, Affluence and Morality’.
Peter Singer wrote his essay ‘Famine, Affluence and Morality’ in November What inspired and motivated him to do so as a graduate student was due to the refugees fleeing from East Pakistan.
Famine, Affluence, and Morality – Peter Singer. In this article, Singer addresses the question of what duties, if any, we owe to those who are in great need.
What are some arguments against Peter Singer's "Famine, Affluence, and Morality"? The Analysis of the Soundness of Peter Singer’s “Famine, Affluence and Morality” Introduction “Famine, Affluence and Morality" was published in and soon became one of the most widely discussed essays in applied ethics.
is and in to a was not you i of it the be he his but for are this that by on at they with which she or from had we will have an what been one if would who has her. Peter Singer: "Famine, Affluence, and Morality" I. Singer’s Main Aim Singer tries to show that we, in affluent countries like the U.S., have a moral obligation to give far more than we actually do in international aid for famine relief, disaster relief, etc.